Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View Date:2024-12-24 01:19:51
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (14728)
Related
- Republican Dan Newhouse wins reelection to US House in Washington
- 'Wonka' returns with more music, less menace
- Bucks, Pacers have confrontation over game ball after Giannis Antetokounmpo scores 64
- Students say their New York school's cellphone ban helped improve their mental health
- Caitlin Clark shanks tee shot, nearly hits fans at LPGA's The Annika pro-am
- Hugh Grant hopes his kids like 'Wonka' after being 'traumatized' by 'Paddington 2'
- Thieves argued they should face lesser charge because their stolen goods were on sale
- An investigation opens into the death of a French actress who accused Depardieu of sexual misconduct
- Vikings' Camryn Bynum celebrates game-winning interception with Raygun dance
- 'Shameless': Reporters Without Borders rebukes X for claiming to support it
Ranking
- Threat closes Spokane City Hall and cancels council meeting in Washington state
- Promising new gene therapies for sickle cell are out of reach in countries where they’re needed most
- Virginia 4th graders fall ill after eating gummy bears contaminated with fentanyl
- Earliest version of Mickey Mouse set to become public domain in 2024, along with Minnie, Tigger
- Deommodore Lenoir contract details: 49ers ink DB to $92 million extension
- Roger Goodell responds to criticism of NFL officials for Kadarius Toney penalty
- Powerball winning numbers for Wednesday night's drawing with $535 million jackpot
- Why your 401(k) is happy: Dow Jones reaches new record after Fed forecasts lower rates
Recommendation
-
Why have wildfires been erupting across the East Coast this fall?
-
Federal Reserve leaves interest rate unchanged, but hints at cuts for 2024
-
13-year-old accused of plotting mass shooting at Temple Israel synagogue in Ohio
-
Austrian court acquits Blackwater founder and 4 others over export of modified crop-spraying planes
-
Why Jersey Shore's Jenni JWoww Farley May Not Marry Her Fiancé Zack Clayton
-
Illinois State apologizes to Norfolk State after fan shouts racial slur during game
-
Senegal’s opposition leader could run for president after a court overturns a ruling barring his bid
-
Congress passes contentious defense policy bill known as NDAA, sending it to Biden